Creation radiometric dating

6854933580_2c8b688306_z

In 1972 this assumption was shown to be highly questionable.Despite this, the momentum gained in the two decades prior to 1972 has made 4.5 b.y.In some cases such as Carbon-14 dating, radioactive dating actually gives strong evidence for a young Earth.Other methods such as Potassium-argon dating and Isochron dating are based on faulty assumptions and so unreliable as to be useless.

Where are the data and age calculations that result in a consistent set of ages for all rocks on earth, as well as those from the moon and the meteorites, no greater than 10 000 years? Second, it is an approach doomed to failure at the outset.Creationists seem to think that a few examples of incorrect radiometric ages invalidate all of the results of radiometric dating, but such a conclusion is illogical.Many people think that radiometric dating has proved the Earth is millions of years old.Did you know that you can be a Christian, and believe that the earth is billions of years old?You can even believe in evolution and be a Christian.There is no conflict between science and the Bible..one needs is a proper understanding how to merge science and the Bible.

You must have an account to comment. Please register or login here!